Kayleigh Gilbert
Oakdale City Council member (Mayor Pro Tem), California Oakdale City Council · Party not on file
OfficeholderOn the 2026 ballotIncumbent · California Oakdale City Council · Nov 3 General
Ballot status source: Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters · read Sep 24, 2026
Running for California Oakdale City Council, Nov 3 General. The race page has 5 other candidates, 3 certified results. See the race
The District
What California Oakdale City Council covers
Covers part of Stanislaus County.
Includes Oakdale.
7 precincts · District lines: Official jurisdiction boundary: California Department of Technology, California City Boundaries and Identifiers (CDTFA city limits; layer edited 2026-09-21) · Precinct lines: California Statewide Database (SWDB) precinct shapes g20, g22 and g24 (sr-precinct), for the 2020, 2022 and 2024 generals; map drawn on g24
Key Votes
The record
Continue the proposed sidewalk maintenance ordinance to Sept. 21 pending a legal opinion · voted Yes
Oakdale City Council, 2026-08-17 · Item 10.1, introduction of the sidewalk maintenance, repair and replacement ordinance. The motion was amended to continue the item to September 21 and request a written legal opinion. Official video at 1:09:40–1:10:22: the clerk's roll call is audible — Kettering yes; 'Mayor Pro Tem Gilbert, yes'; Murdoch yes; Pitassi yes; Mayor Bairos yes — and the Mayor announces 'This item passes 5-0'.
Aug 17, 2026 · Official · City of Oakdale · sourceSeries of water rate increases to fund operations and infrastructure · voted Yes
Oakdale City Council, 2026-06-01 · Item 10.1, resolution approving water rate increases under Prop 218 (after the clerk found no majority protest). Official video at 39:35–41:04: the clerk's roll call is audible — 'Mayor Pro Tem Gilbert. Yes'; Kettering yes; Murdoch yes; Pitassi states 'I'm going to vote no'; Mayor Bairos votes yes — and the Mayor announces 'that passes 4 to one'.
Jun 1, 2026 · Official · City of Oakdale · source
Newest first. A close vote was decided by 5% of the votes cast or less (or 10 votes or fewer, under a fifth of the votes). Broke with party: voted against most of their party, where the record gives the party split.
Their Money
Campaign finance
- Last Change
- Profile updated · Sep 25
- Raised
- Not on file
- Cash on Hand
- Not on file
No totals on file from the reports listed below.
Finance Reports
Campaign finance: FPPC Form 470 short form · Kayleigh Gilbert
Filed FPPC Form 470 (Officeholder and Candidate Campaign Statement, Short Form) as the first pre-election statement for the November 3, 2026 election (period through 2026-09-19); posted by the City of Oakdale City Clerk. A Form 470 means the candidate has no controlled committee and does not expect to receive or spend $2,000 or more in the calendar year, so no contribution or expenditure totals are reported. The filing is kept on record internally; it is not hosted because it carries the filer's address and phone.
Sep 19, 2026 · Official · City of Oakdale City Clerk · source
Money shows as the filings named here report it. Payees are who the campaign paid; individual contributors are not shown.
The Paper Trail
Filings, results and exhibits
On the ballot: Oakdale City Council (at-large, 2 seats) · November 3, 2026 general municipal election
Listed as "Kayleigh Gilbert" on the Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters General Election November 3, 2026 Candidate List (City of Oakdale, Council Member, vote for 2). Ballot designation: Incumbent. Incumbent. Checked 2026-09-24.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters · sourceOakdale City Council (at-large, 2 seats) · CA-LOC-OAKDALE-CITY-COUNCIL
Nonpartisan · candidate · City of Oakdale (Stanislaus County) · 2 seat(s), at-large
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters · source
Not on file for Kayleigh yet: Advertising, In Their Words, In the News, Reach Them. Coverage varies by state and office.
File read Sep 25, 2026. Each item names its source. Record ID p_t2pk5twkk.
GOTV Intel reports are sourced, cited research leads your campaign confirms against the primary record before use. They are never a consumer report and never for employment, credit, insurance, housing or licensure.