Ashley Hinson
U.S. Representative, Iowa 2nd Congressional District · Candidate for Iowa U.S. Senate · Republican
OfficeholderOn the 2026 ballotCandidate · Iowa U.S. Senate · Nov 3 General
Ballot status source: Iowa Secretary of State — Candidate List, November 3, 2026 General Election: United States Senator, Republican, 'Ashley Hinson' · read Sep 24, 2026
Results
Certified results for Iowa U.S. Senate
United States Senator
Iowa General Election 2022-11-08 · Nov 8, 2022| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck GrassleyRepublican | Republican | 681,501 | 56.0% |
| Michael FrankenDemocrat | Democrat | 533,330 | 43.8% |
| Write-in | 1,815 | 0.1% |
Certified — Iowa county canvass results as published by the Iowa Secretary of State (Clarity ENR final county uploads; county totals reconcile exactly to the State Board of Canvassers canvass summary) · Iowa Secretary of State — Election Night Reporting / Precinct Results by County
United States Senator
Iowa General Election 2020-11-03 · Nov 3, 2020| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joni ErnstRepublican | Republican | 864,997 | 51.7% |
| Theresa GreenfieldDemocrat | Democrat | 754,859 | 45.2% |
| Rick StewartLibertarian | Libertarian | 36,961 | 2.2% |
| Suzanne Herzog | 13,800 | 0.8% | |
| Write-in | 1,211 | 0.1% |
Certified — Iowa county canvass results as published by the Iowa Secretary of State (Clarity ENR final county uploads; county totals reconcile exactly to the State Board of Canvassers canvass summary) · Iowa Secretary of State — Election Night Reporting / Precinct Results by County
Key Votes
The record
H.Con.Res. 93: War powers concurrent resolution (Sept. 15, 2026) — voted NoClose vote
On Agreeing to the Resolution · tally 220–204 (9 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 307, 119th Congress, session 2nd
Sep 15, 2026 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 6703: Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 216–211 (6 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 349, 119th Congress, session 1st
Dec 17, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceS. 1582: GENIUS Act — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 308–122 (2 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 200, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jul 17, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 1: One Big Beautiful Bill Act — voted YesClose vote
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment · tally 218–214 · Passed · Roll call 190, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jul 3, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 4: Rescissions Act — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 214–212 (6 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 168, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jun 12, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 1: One Big Beautiful Bill Act (House passage) — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 215–214 (1 present) (2 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 145, 119th Congress, session 1st
May 22, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.J.Res. 88: Disapproval of EPA waiver for California vehicle emission standards — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 246–164 (22 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 114, 119th Congress, session 1st
May 1, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 22: SAVE Act — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 220–208 (5 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 102, 119th Congress, session 1st
Apr 10, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · source
Show all 16 recorded votesShow fewer
H.Con.Res. 14: FY2025 budget resolution (Senate amendment) — voted YesClose vote
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment · tally 216–214 (3 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 100, 119th Congress, session 1st
Apr 10, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 1968: Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 217–213 (2 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 70, 119th Congress, session 1st
Mar 11, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 27: HALT Fentanyl Act — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 312–108 (13 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 33, 119th Congress, session 1st
Feb 6, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceS. 5: Laken Riley Act — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 263–156 (14 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 23, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jan 22, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 28: Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act — voted YesClose vote
On Passage · tally 218–206 (1 present) (9 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 12, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jan 14, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 23: Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 243–140 (1 present) (50 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 7, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jan 9, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceH.R. 29: Laken Riley Act — voted Yes
On Passage · tally 264–159 (11 not voting) · Passed · Roll call 6, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jan 7, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · sourceElection of the Speaker (Jan. 3, 2025) — voted for Johnson (LA)
Election of the Speaker · tally Johnson (LA) 218 Jeffries 215 Emmer 1 · Johnson (LA) · Roll call 2, 119th Congress, session 1st
Jan 3, 2025 · Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · source
Newest first. A close vote was decided by 5% of the votes cast or less (or 10 votes or fewer, under a fifth of the votes). Broke with party: voted against most of their party, where the record gives the party split.
Scorecards
Club for Growth scorecard, 2025: 84%
84% on the Club for Growth's 2025 congressional scorecard; lifetime score 74%. The organization's own rating.
Self-published · Club for Growth · sourceAFL-CIO Legislative Scorecard, 2025: 0%
0% on the AFL-CIO's 2025 Legislative Scorecard; lifetime score 8%. The organization's own rating.
Self-published · AFL-CIO · sourceLeague of Conservation Voters scorecard, 2025: 0%
0% on LCV's 2025 National Environmental Scorecard; lifetime score 8%. The organization's own rating.
Self-published · League of Conservation Voters · sourceHeritage Action for America scorecard, 119th Congress: 87%
87% on Heritage Action's 119th Congress scorecard (key votes and co-sponsorships, updated weekly while Congress is in session). The organization's own rating.
Self-published · Heritage Action for America · source
Committees and Appointments
Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party — Member
U.S. House, 119th Congress · Member
Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives — Member Data (committee assignments) · sourceCommittee on Ethics — Member
U.S. House, 119th Congress · Member
Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives — Member Data (committee assignments) · sourceCommittee on Appropriations — Member
U.S. House, 119th Congress · Member · Subcommittees: Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies; Homeland Security; Financial Services and General Government
Official · Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives — Member Data (committee assignments) · source
Their Money
Campaign finance
- Last Change
- Profile updated · Sep 24
- Raised
- $10,267,215cycle to date through Jun 30
- Cash on Hand
- $6,749,491cycle to date through Jun 30
- Spent
- $5,591,157cycle to date through Jun 30
- Debts Owed
- $0cycle to date through Jun 30
- Next Report Due
- Q3 Report · Oct 15
View on FEC.govFEC, cycle to date through Jun 30, 2026
Top Payees
Who the campaign paid most, as its filing reports it.
- VENTURA MEDIA PARTNERS · media$803.1K
- SOCKO STRATEGIES · finance consulting$230.3K
- ELECTORAL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP · campaign promotional materials-signage$188.3K
- CREATIVE DIRECT · media/digital consulting$180.8K
- GRASSROOTS TARGETING · survey research$161.0K
Campaign finance — Ashley for Iowa: July Quarterly 2026, through Jun 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026 · Official · Federal Election CommissionFinance Reports
Campaign finance — Ashley for Iowa: July Quarterly 2026, through Jun 30, 2026
Raised $10,267,214.85 this cycle · spent $5,591,156.54 · cash on hand $6,749,491.49 · debts owed by the committee $0.00 — through Jun 30, 2026. Where the money came from (cycle to date, as reported): Individuals $5,288,823.32 (52%); PACs and other political committees $2,176,366.77 (21%); Party committees $62,000.00 (1%); Transfers from authorized committees $2,736,550.86 (27%). Where it went (itemized operating expenditures this cycle, FEC-processed through Sep 20, 2026): other $1.30M; individuals (staff, contractors, reimbursements) $413.6K; fundraising $310.8K; digital $308.1K; polling $303.4K; general consulting $229.8K.
Jun 30, 2026 · Official · Federal Election Commission
Filings
- Statement of OrganizationFEC · 2026View the Filing
- Statement of CandidacyFEC · 2026View the Filing
Statement of organization — ASHLEY FOR IOWA (amended)
Filed with the FEC 2026-09-23 (file 2014882).
Sep 23, 2026 · Official · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · sourceStatement of candidacy — ASHLEY FOR IOWA (amended)
Filed with the FEC 2026-09-23 (file 2014883).
Sep 23, 2026 · Official · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · source
Money shows as the filings named here report it. Payees are who the campaign paid; individual contributors are not shown.
Advertising
Who is advertising for and against Ashley
Advertising summary — for and against (2026 cycle)
For: own campaign $234,500 on Google; outside Google ads $109,300–$130,500; Snap $0; broadcast TV pending; FEC independent expenditures $3,966,851. Against: outside Google ads $1,800,084–$2,153,015; opponent campaign ads $0–$0; Snap $61,069; broadcast TV pending; FEC independent expenditures $5,954,568. 2026 cycle. Broadcast TV: not yet searched — not yet counted. Meta not included.
Sep 29, 2026 · Official · Ads summary (2026 cycle)Snapchat ads — WinSenate (opposing)
WinSenate — opposing this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 15 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $61,069–$61,069 (Snap disclosed USD (exact)); 0 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 29, 2026 · Official · Snap Political Ads Library (PoliticalAds.zip 2025–2026) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — HIGH PLAINS PAC (supporting)
HIGH PLAINS PAC — supporting this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 4 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $4,300–$5,500 (Google creative spend ranges, geo-allocated); 4 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — WINSENATE (opposing)
WINSENATE — opposing this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 34 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $790,600–$951,100 (Google creative spend ranges, geo-allocated); 0 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — AB PAC (opposing)
AB PAC — opposing this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 104 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $861,034–$1,032,115 (Google creative spend ranges, geo-allocated); 14 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — FIGHT ON IOWA (supporting)
FIGHT ON IOWA — supporting this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 3 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $105,000–$125,000 (Google creative spend ranges, geo-allocated); 3 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 23, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — LCV VICTORY FUND (opposing)
LCV VICTORY FUND — opposing this candidate (evidence: schedule e). 7 ads since Nov 2024; spend on these ads $148,450–$169,800 (Google creative spend ranges, geo-allocated); 0 of them also linked to other candidates.
Sep 22, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — ASHLEY FOR IOWA (supporting)
The candidate's own campaign (ASHLEY FOR IOWA). 11 ads since Nov 2024; Google-reported $234,200 since Nov 6 2024 (exact, advertiser-wide).
Sep 9, 2026 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · sourceGoogle/YouTube ads — ASHLEY HINSON FOR CONGRESS (supporting)
The candidate's own campaign (ASHLEY HINSON FOR CONGRESS). 3 ads since Nov 2024; Google-reported $300 since Nov 6 2024 (exact, advertiser-wide).
Aug 22, 2025 · Official · Google Political Ads Transparency Report (bundle updated 2026-09-23 21:37 PT) · source
Independent Expenditures
FEC independent expenditures on file: $9,258,200 supporting, $14,987,684 opposing, across 155 reports.
WinSenateOpposing · $7,020,902
27 reports, newest Oct 8, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Americans for Prosperity Action, Inc. (AFP Action) DBA CVA Action and DBA LIBRE ActionSupporting · $4,051,173
33 reports, newest Oct 6, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
FIGHT ON IOWASupporting · $3,599,337
23 reports, newest Oct 8, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
American Meat Producers PACOpposing · $1,708,500
1 report, newest Oct 3, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
LCV Victory FundOpposing · $1,631,922
8 reports, newest Sep 30, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
AB PACOpposing · $1,524,347
12 reports, newest Sep 29, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Lower Costs NowOpposing · $1,421,986
9 reports, newest Oct 6, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Government That Works PACOpposing · $1,015,205
11 reports, newest Oct 7, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
HIGH PLAINS PACSupporting · $515,000
6 reports, newest Sep 17, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Moms for Safe Neighborhoods, Inc.Supporting · $494,000
2 reports, newest Oct 9, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
CFFE PACOpposing · $314,332
2 reports, newest Oct 9, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
WFW ACTION FUND INCSupporting · $260,000
2 reports, newest Oct 9, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Show all 21 spendersShow fewer
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTIONOpposing · $159,425
2 reports, newest Oct 7, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Government That Works PACSupporting · $131,250
1 report, newest Sep 9, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
PROJECT BULLHORN PACOpposing · $127,500
2 reports, newest Oct 2, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
DIGITAL FREEDOM FUNDSupporting · $69,725
1 report, newest Oct 1, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
VoteVetsOpposing · $63,310
2 reports, newest Oct 6, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
America PACSupporting · $59,247
6 reports, newest Oct 9, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Political Action Committee (ABC PAC)Supporting · $45,550
1 report, newest Sep 17, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
SLF PACSupporting · $32,918
1 report, newest Oct 5, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Neighbor VoicesOpposing · $255
3 reports, newest Oct 8, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Spend as each platform or filing reports it. Each line is a separate measure, and they are not added together.
In Their Words
What they have said, on the record
“I know providing health care where people are is so absolutely important and it’s why I’ve tried to be a good partner at the federal level for helping you do what you do best, which is serve patients in your communities”
“These actions to lower costs are needed ASAP, and the war needs to be brought to a successful and immediate end”
“Iowans are being squeezed and shouldn’t have to foot the bill at the pump or the checkout line for the war in Iran”
“I have worked with President Trump and with President Biden to deliver for Iowa because, frankly, I've heard from all of you that's what you expect.”
“I worked very hard listening to you because I heard one big thing: you wanted lower taxes and less government. So we delivered no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, reduced taxes for Social Security, directly targeted at the middle class because it's not the government's money; it's your money.”
“I know families are getting squeezed. I know we have to do more to lower prescription drug prices. And if you just saw the news, they are at a 60-year low. But I know there is more to do to hold those shady PBMs [pharmacy benefit managers] and big pharma companies accountable”
In the News
Press coverage
- Hinson calls for ‘immediate end’ to Iran war after previous votes against ending U.S. involvementSep 23, 2026 · Press · KCRG
- Iowa GOP Senate candidate Ashley Hinson calls for Iran war to end despite voting to let Trump continue itSep 21, 2026 · Press · NBC News
- Democrats aim to flip Iowa's U.S. Senate seat in an increasingly competitive raceSep 18, 2026 · Press · Iowa Public Radio
- Iowa's U.S. Senate candidates make their case for electability at the state fairAug 18, 2026 · Press · Iowa Public Radio
Headlines link to the original reporting, captured on the date shown.
Reach Them
Websites and accounts
- Official Websitehinson.house.govOfficial
- Xx.com/RepAshleyHinsonSelf-published
- Facebookfacebook.com/RepAshleyHinsonSelf-published
Polls
Public polls
Marist PollGeneral election · U.S. Senate
Josh Turek 50% · Ashley Hinson 42% · Someone else 2% · Undecided/No answer 5%
Sep 17, 2026 to Sep 20, 2026 · 1,050 RV · ±4.4 pts · phone/text/online · Marist Poll Iowa
co/efficientGeneral election · U.S. Senate
Ashley Hinson 46% · Josh Turek 42% · Thomas Laehn 2% · Undecided 9%
Sep 14, 2026 to Sep 16, 2026 · 831 LV · ±3.39 pts · text/IVR · co/efficient Iowa Senate Battleground Poll
Released public polls of this race, as each pollster reported them. A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
The 2026 Field
Who else is running for Iowa U.S. Senate
- Thomas LaehnLibertarian · On the 2026 ballot
- Josh TurekDemocrat · On the 2026 ballot
The Paper Trail
Filings, results and exhibits
On the Nov. 3, 2026 general election ballot for U.S. Senator (Iowa) — Republican
Ballot name as certified: “Ashley Hinson”. Designation: Republican.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Iowa Secretary of State · sourceU.S. Senator · IA-SEN
Republican · Candidate · On the 2026 ballot
Sep 19, 2026 · Official
File read Sep 25, 2026. Each item names its source. Record ID p_2668kxqww.
GOTV Intel reports are sourced, cited research leads your campaign confirms against the primary record before use. They are never a consumer report and never for employment, credit, insurance, housing or licensure.