Mark Lamb
Candidate for Arizona 5th Congressional District · Republican
On the 2026 ballotCandidate · Arizona 5th Congressional District · Nov 3 General
Ballot status source: Arizona Secretary of State — 2026 General Election Candidate Listing: USH5, LAMB, MARK (REP) · read Sep 24, 2026
The District
What Arizona 5th Congressional District covers
Covers parts of Maricopa County and Pinal County.
Includes San Tan Valley, Gilbert, Mesa (part), Apache Junction, Queen Creek, Chandler (part) and Sun Lakes (part).
154 precincts · District lines: Congressional lines: U.S. Census Bureau (1:500,000 cartographic boundary, 119th Congress) · Precinct lines: Maricopa County Elections Department, Voting Precincts (2022-2025); Pima County GIS, Voter Precincts — official county layers; Census 2020 VTDs kept in the other 13 counties; U.S. Census Bureau 2020 TIGER/Line VTDs where no official layer
Results
Certified results for Arizona 5th Congressional District
U.S. House District 5
2024 Arizona General Election · Nov 5, 2024| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andy BiggsRepublican | Republican | 255,628 | 60.3% |
| Katrina SchaffnerDemocrat | Democrat | 167,680 | 39.6% |
| Write-in | 574 | 0.1% |
Official canvass · Arizona county official canvasses
Sources (2)
- Official canvass (county Boards of Supervisors)
- partial state coverage — counties: Apache, Coconino, Gila, Graham, Maricopa, Pima, Pinal, Santa Cruz, Yuma, Greenlee (Greenlee County Board of Supervisors, Official Canvass 2024 General (certified 2024-11-19), precinct summary report), Cochise (Cochise County Elections, 2024 General Statement of Votes Cast - Precinct Summary Results Report (official))
U.S. House District 5
2022 Arizona General Election · Nov 8, 2022| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andy BiggsRepublican | Republican | 182,464 | 56.7% |
| Javier Garcia RamosDemocrat | Democrat | 120,243 | 37.3% |
| Clint William SmithIndependent | Independent | 18,851 | 5.9% |
| Write-in | 224 | 0.1% | |
| Not Qualified | 137 | 0.0% | |
| Debra Jo "D-Jo" Borden | 32 | 0.0% |
Official canvass (county Boards of Supervisors); partial state coverage — counties: Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Pima, Pinal · Arizona county official canvasses
U.S. House District 5
2020 Arizona General Election · Nov 3, 2020| Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andy BiggsRepublican | Republican | 262,414 | 58.9% |
| Joan GreeneDemocrat | Democrat | 183,171 | 41.1% |
| Karen StephensRepublican | Republican | 0 | 0.0% |
Official results (Arizona Secretary of State precinct detail file, after county canvasses; state canvass 2020-11-30) · Arizona Secretary of State — results detail
Key Votes
The record
No public voting record
Holds no elected public office. Checked 2026-09-24.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · GOTV Intel review of official candidate lists
Newest first. A close vote was decided by 5% of the votes cast or less (or 10 votes or fewer, under a fifth of the votes). Broke with party: voted against most of their party, where the record gives the party split.
Their Money
Campaign finance
- Last Change
- Profile updated · Sep 25
- Raised
- $1,222,217cycle to date through Jul 1
- Cash on Hand
- $243,426cycle to date through Jul 1
- Spent
- $978,791cycle to date through Jul 1
- Debts Owed
- $0cycle to date through Jul 1
- Next Report Due
- Q3 Report · Oct 15
View on FEC.govFEC, cycle to date through Jul 1, 2026
Top Payees
Who the campaign paid most, as its filing reports it.
- Fulfillment Solutions Inc$270,764.27
- We1 Llc$93,750.00
- Kb Partners$86,653.34
- Campaign Affiliate$82,342.71
- Kfa Consulting$48,000.00
Campaign finance — Mark Lamb For Congress: Pre-Primary 2026, through Jul 1, 2026
Jul 1, 2026 · Official · Federal Election CommissionFinance Reports
Campaign finance — Mark Lamb For Congress: Pre-Primary 2026, through Jul 1, 2026
Raised $1,222,216.64 this election cycle (as reported) · spent $978,790.79 · cash on hand $243,425.85 · debts owed by the committee $0.00 — through Jul 1, 2026. Where the money came from (cycle to date, as reported): Individuals $1,111,290.56 (91%); PACs and other political committees $70,400.00 (6%); Candidate contributions $46.61 (0%); Candidate loans $40,000.00 (3%); Other receipts (refunds, offsets, other) $479.47 (0%). Where it went (itemized operating expenditures this cycle, FEC-processed through Sep 20, 2026): direct mail $414,484.64; general consulting $181,092.71; fundraising $123,242.68; staff, contractors and reimbursements $74,800.35; other $58,013.09; polling $15,700.00.
Jul 1, 2026 · Official · Federal Election Commission
Money shows as the filings named here report it. Payees are who the campaign paid; individual contributors are not shown.
Advertising
Who is advertising for and against Mark
Advertising summary — for and against (2026 cycle)
For: own campaign $0 on Google; outside Google ads $0–$0; Snap $0; broadcast TV not searched; FEC independent expenditures $16. Against: outside Google ads $0–$0; opponent campaign ads $0–$0; Snap $0; broadcast TV not searched; FEC independent expenditures $0. 2026 cycle. Broadcast TV: not yet searched. Meta not included.
Official · Ads summary (2026 cycle)
Independent Expenditures
FEC independent expenditures on file: $16 supporting, $0 opposing, across 5 reports.
FREEDOM CAUCUS FUNDSupporting · $16
5 reports, newest Aug 26, 2026 · Federal Election Commission — electronic filing · newest filing
Spend as each platform or filing reports it. Each line is a separate measure, and they are not added together.
In Their Words
What they have said, on the record
“The fix is you take away qualified immunity for uh prosecutors and for judges. And the reason why is because they want to take it away from us. So we're out making split-second decisions. These guys have all the time in the world to take a look at a case and review it and look at all the evidence and everything. If you release somebody, you should absolutely have no qualified immunity. And if judges could be sued, they wouldn't let anybody out. None of these kids that are repeat offenders would make it out of jail. And those kids would learn hard lessons and they would throw the book at them. And any prosecutor who dropped charges only to have that person go back out and re-offend and hurt another American or victimize another American, they should be held accountable too because they don't need qualified immunity. They have all the time in the world. Qualified immunity should be reserved for the police who go out and make split-second decisions.”
In the News
Press coverage
- Arizona 5th Congressional District election, 2026Jul 21, 2026 · Ballotpedia · Ballotpedia
- Borders, Badges, and Congress with Sheriff Mark Lamb (Part 2)Jun 28, 2026 · Press · Cops and Writers Podcast
Headlines link to the original reporting, captured on the date shown.
Reach Them
Websites and accounts
Campaign website capture
Campaign website https://marklamb.us/ captured 2026-09-24T19:21:49Z (1280x900 viewport, logged-out).
Sep 24, 2026 · Self-published · Campaign website · sourceCampaign website: https://marklamb.us/
Source: https://marklamb.us/
Sep 24, 2026 · Self-published · Campaign website · source
The 2026 Field
Who else is running for Arizona 5th Congressional District
- Elizabeth LeeDemocrat · On the 2026 ballot
- Richard GraysonGreen · Filed for 2026
The Paper Trail
Filings, results and exhibits
On the ballot: U.S. House, Arizona 5th District — November 3, 2026 general election
Listed as "Mark Lamb" (REP) on the Arizona Secretary of State (2026 Primary Election official canvass; general nominees derived from certified primary results) certified candidate list for the 2026 General Election (as of 2026-08-05 (canvass report date)). Checked 2026-09-24.
Sep 24, 2026 · Official · Arizona Secretary of State (2026 Primary Election official canvass; general nominees derived from certified primary results) · sourceU.S. Representative · AZ-05
Republican · Candidate · On the 2026 ballot
Sep 4, 2026 · Official · Arizona Secretary of State
Not on file for Mark yet: Polls. Coverage varies by state and office.
File read Sep 25, 2026. Each item names its source. Record ID p_nan1hjtjj.
GOTV Intel reports are sourced, cited research leads your campaign confirms against the primary record before use. They are never a consumer report and never for employment, credit, insurance, housing or licensure.